Southwest Airlines has been permanently barred from using any future social media posts by flight attendant Charlene Carter as grounds to discipline or dismiss her β the latest in a run of legal defeats for the Dallas-based carrier in a case that has now been running for nine years.
How the case began
Carter was a veteran Southwest flight attendant when she was fired in 2017 for sending what the airline described as extremely graphic images of aborted foetuses to other crew members via Facebook, without their consent. Southwest accused her of workplace bullying and of breaching its social media policy.
Carter sued both the airline and TWU Local 556, the union representing Southwest's flight attendants, arguing religious discrimination and contending that her posts were protected expression of a sincerely held religious belief. The dispute had grown out of her objection to positions taken by the union's leadership.
Nine years of litigation
A Texas jury sided with Carter in 2022 and ordered Southwest and TWU Local 556 to pay her more than $5 million. The award was cut on appeal to around $1 million, and the money did not actually reach her until April this year β a payout totalling $946,102.87. The same body of rulings also required Southwest to reinstate her with full seniority, and she continues to work for the airline today.
What remained unsettled was forward-looking. The courts had established that Southwest could not discipline Carter for social media posts she had already made. It was less clear whether the airline retained the option of pursuing disciplinary charges over anything she posted in the future.
The permanent injunction
Last week, North Texas district judge Brantley Starr closed that gap. He issued a permanent injunction against any future violations of Carter's rights, ruling that Southwest is enjoined from 'proactively searching for, relying on, or using Carter's religious statements, including those concerning abortion, posted on social media, or otherwise in disciplining, discharging, or taking any negative employment action against her.'
The same ruling also restrains TWU Local 556 from attempting to get Southwest to discipline Carter over any future social media posts she makes about her religious beliefs. In practice, the order removes both routes by which the dispute could have been reopened.
Why it matters beyond one crew member
Cabin crew social media conduct has become one of the more contested areas of airline employment policy. Carriers have tightened rules sharply in recent years over uniform photographs, layover content and posts that can be traced back to the brand, and several have made breaches a dismissal offence.
A permanent injunction of this kind does not overturn those policies. What it does establish, in this jurisdiction and for this employee, is a firm boundary around religious expression: a carrier cannot monitor an employee's religious statements online and act on them. For airline human resources departments watching the case, that is the line worth noting as social media policies are redrafted.
Sources: Paddle Your Own Kanoo. Featured image: AI-generated by AviationShop. By James Holloway.
Comments
Loading commentsβ¦